Gluten free foods are one of the latest nutritional trends, as many parents believe that foods labeled gluten are more free than gluten foods.
But new research published in the Pediatrics Internet magazine says it’s not right unless your child really avoids gluten, a protein in wheat, barley and rye due to celiac disease or other conditions.
High sugar content
In this study, approximately 9 out of 10 gluten-free foods that can be used in children can be classified as an appropriate nutritional value.
The author of the study, Charlene Elliott, a Canadian researcher on food and child health marketing at the University of Calgary, said: “The halo that is not intended for gluten is essential.”
“About 80 percent of the non-gluten-free products contained high sugar, and regular and gluten-free products had sugar content,” he said. Gluten-free foods were not at all healthy. ”
Some children should take gluten-free foods. For example, if children with celiac disease, gluten-based intake, based on the celiac disease, causes an immune response that affects the small intestine. The researchers said nearly 1% of the world population has celiac disease.
Some people have gluten sensitivity or intolerance, and others have allergies to wheat. The foundation says that these conditions cause significant gluten-induced symptoms. Your child’s doctor can identify any of these conditions, although some may require more testing.
The basic reports of many foods include gluten, such as fruits, vegetables, meat, poultry, fish, seafood, dairy, beans, legumes and nuts. However, many products, such as bread, pasta, cookies and other sweets, usually contain gluten.
Replacing these products with gluten-free options has become a big business. The researchers said that by 2020, gluten-free foods would cost about $ 400 million (± 790 million rials) in 2015 in the United States. By 2020, gluten-free foods are expected to be over $ 2 billion ($ 299 billion).
Previous research showed that about one third of people chose gluten-free foods because they thought these products were healthy, according to researchers. 23% thought that these products could help in weight loss.
For his new study, Elliott and his team bought more than 350 targeted products from two large supermarket chains in Calgary. Examples of child-focused products were those who had the words “baby” or “baby” on them; they showed TV links; films and toys; promoted for lunchboxes; lovely graphics and games They had, or had the words “fun” or “play” on them.
Researchers found nutritional values of regular products as gluten-free.
Poor nutritional quality
About 88 percent of gluten-free products did not have good food because of high levels of sugar, salt, or fat. Research team said many foods without gluten had a lower protein content than standard products.
Regular “baby” foods can not feed well. Approximately 97% are also known to have poor nutritional quality.
Eliot said, “The bottom line is that parents should” look closely at the facts of nutrition label “with regard to the claims in front of the box.”
Samantha Heller, a nutritionist, agreed to NYU Langone Health in New York City.
“I like that parents are trying to find healthy foods for their children, but they are misled by advertisers,” he said. Gluten free is just a “new” fat, “Heller points out to some of the past marketing of fat foods that are automatically safe for you.
“As long as there’s no medical reason to be without gluten, there’s no reason to take gluten,” he explained. “Your kids can enjoy a good amount of pasta and bread,” he added, adding that to avoid drinking sweet More, fast food and unwanted foods.